His Holiness the Pope at the Phanar

Here’s a photopost of the Pope’s trip to the Ecumenical Patriarchate in the Phanar on Wed.

Click on the photos for bigger versions.

Patriarch Bartholomew of Constantinople personally welcomed His Holiness Pope Benedict XVI at the airport in Istanbul, old Constantinople and formerly Byzantium.

The Pope was welcomed by a gift of flowers.

His Holiness Pope Benedict XVI was officially welcomed by Patriarch Bartholomew of Constantinople amidst the festal pealing of bells and was followed by a Doxology in the Patriarchal Cathedral of St. George.

His Holiness lighted a candle at the entrance of the Cathedral.

The Pope and Patriarch were preceded by deacons swinging thuribles.

Speeches of welcome were exchanged. First by the Patriarch, then the Pope.

There was also a joint prayer service. His Holiness, in choir with the ermine trimmed velvet mozetta, was vested with a stole.

The Pope and Patriarch then jointly imparted the benediction.
Before proceeding to the Throne Room, the Pope and Patriarch venerated the relics of Sts Gregory the Theologian and John Chrysostom, former Archbishops of Constantinople which were graciously returned by His Holiness Pope John Paul II of blessed memory. After that the Patriarch also introduced the Pope to the hierarchs of the Ecumenical Throne.

Some idle chit chat followed. Then Patriarch Bartholomew and Pope Benedict XVI met privately to discuss issues regarding Orthodox and Roman Catholic relations, including interreligious dialogue, world peace and mutual understanding.

The Pope then left the Phanar again to the festive pealing of bells in the hope of returning the next day for the Feast of St. Andrew, Patron of the Church of Constantinople.

All photos courtesy of the Ecumenical Patriarchate (www.patriarchate.org) and N. Manginas.

You can access them directly here or by clicking the thumbnails below:

Photos: Pope Benedict XVI Arrives at the Phanar

Wednesday, November 29, 2006

Photo N. Manginas	Photo N. Manginas	Photo N. Manginas
Photo N. Manginas	Photo N. Manginas	Photo N. Manginas
Photo N. Manginas	Photo N. Manginas	Photo N. Manginas
Photo N. Manginas	Photo N. Manginas	Photo N. Manginas
Photo N. Manginas	Photo N. Manginas	Photo N. Manginas
Photo N. Manginas	Photo N. Manginas	Photo N. Manginas
Photo N. Manginas

On the Solemnity of Our Lord Jesus Christ, the King

We recently celebrated, in the reformed calendar of Pope Paul VI, the Solemnity of Our Lord Jesus Christ, the King, marking the end of the Liturgical Year.

Matt Doyle has an excellent and comprehensive post on this. I recommend that you go read it.

I just want to add this little reflection.

We can confess with our lips that Christ is Our King till the cows come home, but, practically, how far does God’s Kingship truly extend in our lives? Is Christ King over us in Church only? Is He King over us only when we pray? Is Christ King only over the parts of our lives that we allow Him to be King over or is He truly Sovereign? Does Jesus truly reign over our whole lives, every aspect of it?

At the end of the Liturgical year, and as we move on towards Advent and in the expectation of Christ’s 2^nd Coming in Glory, it’s a good time for us to reflect on this. Is the Lord Jesus Christ our King when we are at work, at school, at home, in the privacy of our bedrooms? Is Christ King over our minds? King over the thoughts we think, the movies we see, the things we say, the music we listen to?

Is Christ King over our bodies as well? Is Christ King over the way we dress, how we treat out bodies, the living Temples of the Holy Spirit, how we display our bodies, what we do with our hands and feet, where we go?

A King will be embarrassed if His subjects act in an unbecoming way, embarrassed to claim them as His own. Do we too embarrass our God and King by our behaviour? Will Christ be ashamed of us?

Let me be the first to confess that it sure ain't easy letting Jesus rule over me, over every aspect of my life. There are certain parts of my life that I'd rather keep private, thank you very much. But I know that Christ is either King over me fully and totally or He is not King over me at all. He's no partial part-time King. Its hard, very very hard, I can tell you that. But I am still striving and though I want to say that its gets easier as time passes, it really does not. Every day is a struggle to master myself and to conform myself to Christ my Lord. Prayer plays an important part is discipleship, so disciplined and consistent prayer does help. So does fasting and corporal mortification, for the greater glory of God.

To acknowledge Christ’s Kingship and to profess to do His will is to know His will. We can’t do what we don’t know.

To freely confess that Christ is King is to say, ‘Thy will O Lord is my command’. But how can we do God’s will if we don’t know it? Jesus says “Everyone who belongs to the truth listens to my voice”. Do we listen to Him and allow His Word, revealed in the Sacred Scriptures and resounding through the living Magisterium of the Catholic Church to guide and govern us?

Lets strive to do His will, and lets strive to know His will. And for this, we must strive to know and study God’s Word. As the great St. Jerome once said: “Ignorance of the Scriptures is ignorance of Christ”.

Temptations do come and temptations will come. And we can be sure that we will fall. But by the grace of God, and through the Sacraments of the Church, we can be forgiven and restored in our relationship with Him. So long as we repent and acknowledge our creatureliness before our Creator, we can be assured that, as the words of absolution are spoken over us, that we are forgiven.

In all things however, lets abandon ourselves to God through the intercession of the Blessed Virgin Mary for by ourselves, we are nothing and all our efforts and in vain if the Spirit does not animate it. But if God is with us, who can be against us?

To Him, Our King, be all glory for ever and ever.

Amen.

When the Anglicans get their Boss' name wrong

When the Anglicans themselves can't spell the name of the present Archbishop of Canterbury right, you know something has gone wrong somewhere. =)

In the All Saints Anglican Church's website, thats the parish for the Anglicans in Rome, Rowan is spelled Rowen.

Here's the relevant excerpt:

Rowen William's Visit

5 November was an exciting day for All Saints Church, when Archbishop Rowen Williams came to preside and preach at our 10.30 service. St Paul's within the Walls and the Swedish Church had both closed down for the day so that their parishioners could join us. A combined All Saints-St Paul's choir sang beautifully and Wijnand van de Pol gave us as good an organ performance as we can expect this side of heaven.

Even on the front news page, they got his name wrong.

Rowen William's Visit. 5 November was an exciting day for All Saints Church, when Archbishop Rowen Williams came to preside and preach at our 10.30 service. St Paul's within the Walls and the Swedish Church had both closed down for the day so that their parishioners could join us.

I mean come on, the poor guy has been in office for a couple of years now and its not as if he's not been in the news lately trying to stop his Communion from splitting apart.

For all Catholics reading this, the name of the current Holy Father, gloriously reigning, is His Holiness Pope Benedict XVI.

I just think its a good thing to actually know the name of the guy who's heading your Church. Unlike a certain John Kerry =)

Liturgical Rants

I’ve been reading the address of His Eminence Francis Cardinal Arinze. Like his predecessor, His Eminence Jorge Cardinal Medina Estevez, Cardinal Arinze is also concerned about the disintegrating unity of the Latin Rite, as purposeful mistranslations distort the original Latin and irreverent tinkling with the text and evident disregard of the rubrics results in Mass confusion, pardon the pun =). I think that they should stop lamenting and do something, legislate something about it.

I think that the freeing of the Classical Roman Rite is the long awaited and long rumoured motu proprio will be a stabilizing force and a benchmark to reform the reform.

However, I also think that many people are quite happy with a reverently celebrated Novus Ordo. What attracts many people to the Classical Roman Mass, besides its beauty and transcendence, its majesty and poetic cadences, its reverence for God's Majesty and the great Mystery of Faith that is transpiring, is its inherent stability. And stability, if you ever talk to people who are forced to travel from parish to parish or endure 2 different priests in a single parish, is a scarce commodity these days.

Many priests think that the public liturgical prayer of the Church is their own personal property that they should feel free to modify at will. Many priests continually whine about Rome imposing its will on ‘their liturgy’ while at the same time imposing their own will on their poor long-suffering parishioners who can’t do squat about it. The priest at least, has the option of ignoring Rome and the rubrics, an option that many of them utilize on a regular basis.

In many cities, each different parish Church seems to be celebrating a different Rite. Latin with Chant in one place (that’s extremely rare though) and rock music, with drums and Charismatic hand waving in another. Folksy guitar music with Kumbayas here and the recited Kyrie, Sanctus and Agnus Dei there. Dancing girls traipsing down the aisle in this Church and clown masses in the next. The stability in the Roman Rite has been lost and you can’t really know what to expect if you visit a Church that is not your own.

The quickie Masses in some places these days might even embarrass those old mumbled Latin Low Masses. At every Mass, even one with very poor attendance, ‘EXTRAordinary’ Ministers of Holy Communion are everywhere. Perhaps a class on the meaning of extraordinary, focusing on the extra part should be introduced in Seminary.

The Roman Canon is also seldom heard these days cos ‘Its too looo-ng’ whereas the meaningless non-related stories and jokes that Father tells don’t make the Mass too long. And I’m not even going to talk about the petitions at the Mass. The Roman Canon incorporates the prayers for the ‘Holy Catholic Church’, for the living, for the dead, and ‘for ourselves too, though we are unworthy’. But instead they use the shortest possible prayer, EPII and have long and repetitive petitions[Did Vatican II not say something about eliminating useless repetitions?] with even longer and increasingly ridiculous responses. [For those who are used to ‘Lord, hear our prayer’ and ‘Lord, graciously hear us’, you won’t understand this complaint. We have responses like ‘Lord, please teach us to be generous’ or ‘Lord, help us to be more caring’ in response to ‘For our departed loved ones, that they may enjoy eternal beatitude with Christ and all his saints’. This is a serious theological error that shifts the focus from God whom we are asking to grant our petitions to us whom we are asking God to transform.] Why the need to say it all over again, with more, but less majestic, words?

Holy Communion should be the highlight of the Mass. While the Consecration is re-presenting and making present the same Sacrifice of the Cross in an unbloody manner and the transubstantiating of the bread and wine into the Body and Blood, Soul and Divinity of Our Lord Jesus Christ, Holy Communion is taking that same Jesus Christ, Body and Blood, Soul and Divinity into ourselves and being one with Him.

I really don’t understand why we can allocate 20 minutes for a dance routine or a testimony or a long praise song but can’t wait to get Holy Communion over with. If the impatience and rush is born out of ignorance, then perhaps more catechesis is in order, not EXTRA ‘EXTRAordinary’ Ministers of Holy Communion?

Even if the only advantage of Latin is to prevent the priest from ad-libbing the prayers [cos those who like to ad-lib probably won't know enough Latin to do so and those who bothered to study Latin are probably educated enough to know better and not mess around with the church's public prayers] or sparing the laity from the ad-libbing (cos they’ll be following the correct translations from their Missals even if the priest ad-libs) it would then be worth the effort.

I plan on commenting on the address. Can’t seem to find the time yet. Look for it here soon.

Cemetery desecrated in Johore

In Malaysia, not even the dead can rest in peace anymore.
The pics were scanned from the Herald.





Here's the related story from the Herald:

Johore Bahru: Scores of Catholics who went to pay homage to their departed loved ones on All Souls Day were aghast and in tears when they saw the deplorable condition of the 60 year old Catholic Cemetery in Jalan Kebun Teh here.

'All Souls Day' turned out to be 'All Desecrated Day' for them.

To cause more misery to the people, the crosses, statues of angels and Our Lady adorning the tombstones were rudely hacked off, apparently with a blunt instrument, and strewn on the grass.

John Foo, the coordinator for Vietnamese migrant workers based in Ulu Tiram indicated that some ten statues and thirty crosses were destroyed. He said that those who came to the cemetery were crying uncontrollably on seeing the sight.

Foo, whose granduncle is also buried there, noted that even his late uncle's tombstone was not spared. "It was a sad sight to see families collecting the debris of the damaged statues and crosses that would cost them thousands of ringgit to fully restore", he said.

Foo had travelled all the way only to find the cemetery in this dastardly condition. He was completely dumbfounded and shocked. He hoped that the Church and the police would take proper action against the perpetrators.

Anthony Teng, 31, who was also on hand to pay homage to his great-grandparents, also expressed anger and disappointment.

He said this sort of rampant desecration is becoming common in Catholic institutions in the country and the authorities, especially the police, should apprehend and prosecute the culprits.

Teng added that he was deeply upset and annoyed and whoever had done this, did not have any respect for the dead and especially for the living.

He also called on the Malaysian Consultative Council for Buddhism, Christianity, hinduism, Sikhism (MCCBCHS) Johor Chapter to seriously consider looking into this increasing problem.

He added that the Church authorities must do something immediately, otherwise these irresponsible individuals might next target the Sg. Tiram Cemetery.

When contacted, Fr. Anthony Ng, the Chancellor of the Malacca-Johore Diocese expressed shock and sadness over the incident. He said, "We do not know who has done such a shameful act, but I hope that such incidents would not occur again", adding that he trusted that the relevant authorities would beef up security and take the necessary measures.

Fr. Ng added that he has advised the priest-in-charge of the Kebun Teh cemetery to officially lodge a police report over the incident. However, as at press time, it is not known if a police report has been lodged by the Church authorities. - Vincent D'Silva

Mob intimidation at Church

I have purposely waited for the temperature over this incident to cool down before blogging about it. Its been 3 weeks so here it goes.


What does the angry crowd in the photo above have to do with the children in the photo below?

Here's what the Herald, published by the Archbishop of Kuala Lumpur and ever minding its language had to say:

Ipoh : Rumours that were circulated through SMSes nearly jeopardised the peace, harmony and religious freedom experienced by the Catholics of Ipoh. All was well when the Tamil Mass began at 7.OOam on Sunday, November 5, 2006. However by 7.30 am, assistant parish priest Fr Dominic Santhiyagu had realised (from the altar) the mounting presence of police personnel and patrol cars on the main road. The crowd had swelled outside and Federal Reserve Unit (FRU) person¬nel and trucks had arrived and taken up their posi¬tions along the main road in front of the church. Soon the crowd on the right side of the church started shouting, "Kalau Mansor masuk, bakar bangunan ini! " (If Mansor goes in, burn the building). They then advanced to the gateway and began shouting religious slogans in Arabic. However, the FRU personnel took control of the situation and moved the crowd further up the road, away from the church vicinity.

Roads leading to the Church were packed with vans, cars and motorcycles paeked at the side, not belonging to the parishioners but the demonstrators, who comprised not only men, but also women, children and babies. [Thats it. Get them started young and make it a family outing.]

What had brought this mass of people from a different religious faith to the steps of the Church of Our Lady of Lourdes, Ipoh on the day of a First Holy Communion celebration? The SMSes might shed some light.

One went thus: Sejumlah Melayu akn dibaptiskan oleh Dato Azhar Mansor Ahad ini di Gereja Selibin IPOH. Seramai 600 plajar Poli teknik Unku Omr Ipoh telah msuk Kristian baru2 ini. Pendedahan oleh Mufti Perak ptg ini di masjid Negeri. Sampaikan sms kpd org-2 yg mahukan ISLAM (A number of Malays will be baptised by Dato Azhar Mansor this Sunday at the Silibin Church, Ipoh. Recently 600 students from the Ungku Omar Polytechnic have converted to Christianity. Revealed by the Perak Mufti (Remember this fellow as he comes in the picture again later.) this afternoon at the state Masjid. Please forward to all who stand for Islam).

Regardless of the imminent danger looming, parishioners moved through the crowds to attend the 9.00am Mass to be celebrated in three languages (English, Tamil and Bahasa Malaysia). By then, the roads had been sealed and no car was allowed into the church compound. The air was tense, but the parishioners took their places in the church in a very orderly manner, as though oblivious to what was going on around them. Many however, must have unanswered questions as to what was happening!

Still, as a precaution, men -young and old- had stationed themselves casually all around the church to give a sense of security and confidence to those attending Mass.

Mass started on time with the procession led by 98 children beautifully dressed in white like little angels, followed by the altar boys and the priest. They proceeded from the Lourdes Church Hall to the entrance, carefully watched by our Muslim brothers and sisters who had gathered outside. Parish priest Fr. Bernard Paul, sensing the fear and anxiety of the children, had earlier had earlier talked to them and put them at ease.

Nevertheless, when Fr. Bernard himself began the celebration of the Mass, his anxiety was apparent in his voice. Mass progressed in all three languages, witnessed, heard and perhaps even monitored by the whole community, inside and outside the church, as the outdoor public address address system had been turned on to enable everyone to participate in the Mass. Anyway, there is nothing in the Church to hide, only everything to share and witness.

It was a day when attendance at Mass, as usual, included migrants from Africa and Indonesia had come in full strength, as well as our brothers and sisters from East Malaysia. Many of them knew of the SMSes but came regardless of the possible danger.

Other than a firecracker that went off beside the church during Mass, nothing untoward happened, thanks to the tight security and personal attention given by the Perak Special Branch Chief, Ipoh Assistant OCPD and various FRU and police personnel- civil as well as those in uniform, Catholics and non-Catholics alike.

Fr. Dominic Santhiyagu felt that the reading, which focussed on loving God and loving neighbour, was appropriate. He wondered why this demonstration was taking place, when the Church is clear about the country's rules regarding conversions. He added that while it is good publicity for the parish, it is shameful that people are acting on rumours.

Fr. Bernard felt that the parishioners were well focussed. Even though on both ends of the road had been blocked by the demonstrators and the situation seemed unstable, some of the parishioners just told the demonstrators, "Bagi jalan. Kita mahu pergi gereja"[This means "Give way. We want to go to Church".] and they walked right through the crowd to profess their faith. "But there was fear in me ... for the safety of my people ... I was worried how it will all turn out", he admitted.

On a solemn note, he added "A sad state of affairs because it shows how gullible people are and how quickly they believe in lies rather than checking first before responding. moreover, they are disrupting our religious service. This is our Sunday celebration! it is unjust ... a civil rights' offence!"-Herald

Here's what the Council of Churches, Malaysia, a grouping of mostly mainline Protestant Church had to say about the incident.

Safeguard rights of all religious communities

Petaling Jaya : The Council of Churches of Malaysia (CCM) has appealed to the Prime Minister and his Cabinet to safeguard the rights of all religious communities. This was said in a statement issued on Nov 7 following the incident, which took place at the Church of Our Lady of Lourdes, Ipoh. The CCM also called on the authorities to deal firmly with those who try to "instill a climate of fear by perpetrating dubious text messages or demonstrating in front of religious places."

---

MAJLIS GEREJA-GEREJA MALAYSIA
COUNCIL OF CHURCHES OF MALAYSIA
26 Jalan University, 46200 Petaling Jaya,
Selangor Darul Ehsan, Malaysia
Tel: 03-79567092/79551587 Fax: 03-79560353
E-Mail: cchurchm@streamyx.com

Press Statement
The Council of Churches of Malaysia (CCM) views with great concern the incident that took place at Our Lady of Lourdes Church, Ipoh on November 5. Why should worshippers who attend church be subjected to trepidation caused by unruly mobs bent on disrupting the religious and holy ceremonies of a religious community? What such acts have shown is that religious extremism is rearing its ugly head and soon such mobs may appear in other churches throughout the country to shake the foundations of interreligious understanding and respect that has kept our nation at peace all these years. We appeal to the Prime Minister and his cabinet that a clear statement be issued that the rights of all religious communities to worship in peace will be respected and protected. All attempts by ill-intentioned groups to instil a climate of fear, by perpetrating dubious text messages or demonstrating in front of religious places, should be dealt with firmly by the authorities to ensure such incidents do not recur.

Sincerely,
Tan Sri Bishop Dr Lim Cheng Ean
President of CCM

Rev Dr Hermen Shastri
General Secretary

The mainstream papers like The Star also gave extensive coverage about this event, going so far as to label the crowd that gathered a mob.

Now, this rumour was not just started by any Tom, Dick or Harry. That would not give it any credibility. As least I hope so.

It was started by the Mufti (thats equivalent to the Bishop) of the state of Perak where the Church was located. He of course duly blamed a woman.

From The Star:

'Baptism' message started by woman, claims Perak Mufti

By MAZNI MUSTAFA

newsdesk@thestar.com.my

IPOH: Perak Mufti Datuk Seri Harussani Zakaria [Remember him?] has named a woman in her 40s as the originator of a text message that claimed a group of Muslims was going to be baptised at a church here last month.

He claimed the woman is a graduate of the International Islamic University, who later studied at the Al-Azhar University in Cairo.

Harussani: ‘What I revealed was meant to stay within the confines of the meeting’

“Upon her return, she joined a missionary group that carried out social work. She later converted to Christianity and now claims to have returned to Islam,” he told reporters at his home in Kampung Melayu Gunung Rapat here yesterday.

Harussani said he had had an audience with the Sultan of Perak, Sultan Azlan Shah, to explain his stand on the issue.

“The Sultan is happy and satisfied with my explanation,” he said of his 9am meeting with the Ruler.

The SMS, which was widely circulated last week, had alleged that national mariner Datuk Azhar Mansor would lead a ceremony to baptise a group of students at the Church of Our Lady of Lourdes in Silibin here on Nov 5.

It was later found that the supposed baptism was an event to mark the first Holy Communion for about 100 Catholic children.

Harussani said the woman had sent him an SMS message on Oct 21 to give the time and place of the alleged baptism. He asked her to meet him at his house.

“She came with her husband a day before Hari Raya,” he said, adding that she brought along compact discs and documents that purportedly disclosed that Azhar would be at the church to baptise the Malay students.

Harussani claimed he handed all the information to the police and the Special Branch for their investigation.

He said he raised his concerns over the allegations with representatives of Muslim non-governmental organisations at the state mosque here on Nov 2.

“What I revealed was meant to stay within the confines of the meeting. I did not know that those present would pass the word around.

“It was never my intention to create chaos. [Right.] As the mufti (Muslim scholar who interprets Syariah laws), I have the responsibility to remind Muslims of the threats facing Islam today,” he said.

SMS ALERT: Harussani showing the message on the supposed baptism. He said the woman who sent him the message also met him and brought along documents to back up her claim.

“I heard about the commotion at the church while I was in Syria. I am saddened and disappointed by the turn of events.

“I was only carrying out my duty as a mufti to inform the necessary people of the supposed baptism,” he said, stressing that he had not spread the SMS or told people to protest. [He should have told the police instead. In Malaysia, baptizing a Muslim is a criminal offence.]

Asked about the anxiety and tension the SMS had stirred, Harussani said: “What they did (circulating it) [Andrew: He of course claims that what he said was perfectly right. But for internal circulation only.]was wrong. Why can’t they leave it to the police to investigate?”

Harussani said he gave his statement to the police on Saturday during a four-hour meeting with state police chief Deputy Comm Datuk Aziz Bulat and Special Branch chief Senior Asst Comm (II) Dr Ab Rahman Ismail at his house.

When contacted, Inspector-General of Police Tan Sri Musa Hassan said police would investigate the mufti’s statement.

“We will act accordingly,” he added.

He was, of course, immediately contradicted by the Chief Minister of Perak and the Malaysian Minister of Information who says that the good Mufti has been spreading fear by claiming that 100,000 Malays has apostatized.

Again, from The Star:

MB: Mufti briefed group about conversion claims

KUALA LUMPUR: Perak Mufti Datuk Harussani Zakaria had only informed a group of people at a closed-door meeting at the state mosque of the allegations that some Muslims had converted to Christianity, said Datuk Seri Tajol Rosli Ghazali.

The Perak Mentri Besar said the objective of the meeting had been to control young people so that they would not go astray.

“But somebody picked up one of the examples given and cited Datuk Azhar Mansor. The Mufti is not involved in the SMS but he might be the reason for the SMS being spread,” he said yesterday after attending the Umno pre-council briefing by the party president at PWTC.

Zainuddin: Says issuing factually wrong statements could lead to public outrage

A widely circulated SMS caused quite a furore last week because it alleged that national mariner Datuk Azhar Mansor was an apostate, and would lead a ceremony to baptise a group of students at the Church of Our Lady Lourdes in Ipoh on Nov 5. [Why in the world would a layman be permitted to baptize people in Church?]

This turned out to be false and the supposed baptism was in fact the Holy Communion for 100 Catholic children.

Tajol Rosli said the mufti had explained to reporters on Sunday what had actually taken place.

“It's up to the police to investigate,” he said.

Information Minister Datuk Seri Zainuddin Maidin said that many people suspected Harussani had sent the recent offensive SMS because he had previously made claims of Muslims turning apostates.

He said earlier this year the mufti told a Malay daily that over 100,000 Muslims in the country had converted to other religions.

“So, when the recent SMS surfaced many believed it had come from him,” the minister added.

The mufti had claimed then that the number of Muslims who converted was provided to him by a group of professionals and students. [Who of course remain nameless]

The Malaysian Islamic Development Department (Jakim), later denied the figures, alleging they were obtained through unreliable sources.

Zainuddin said: “The problems that arose from the SMS and how Harussani was made to look like its sender, should serve as a lesson to all those in senior positions.”

He said civil servants in positions of authority should refrain from making statements unless the facts had been verified by the relevant government agencies.

They should be able to distinguish matters that are sensitive in nature, he said, adding that issuing factually wrong statements could lead to public outrage.

Zainuddin said they should not blame the media for running their inaccurate statements because the media would regard them as reliable sources of information.

“The onus is on the government officials to make sure that they have all the facts because they have all the resources, including the police, to check if the facts they received are true,” he said.

Sisters In Islam programme manager Norhayati Kaprawi said the Perak Mufti should have kept the information of the alleged baptism ceremony to himself if he had doubts about the authenticity and validity of the claims.

“He should have kept the information to himself and submitted it only to the police for further investigation.

“He should not have disseminated the unverified outrageous claims to other Muslim NGOs in a mosque,” she said in a statement here yesterday.

Here's the actual numbers of applications to renounce Islam.

A Muslim Professor who studied the issue of apostasy or murtad among the Malay Muslim population had this to say:

Apostasy numbers are minimal

Kuantan : Conversions from Islam are minimal and nowhere near the 100,000 figure bandied around by some religious leaders, said a researcher. Based on official data obtained from the state syariah courts, religious departments and the National Registration Department (NRD), the number of conver¬sions are only in the hundreds. Dr Mohd Azam Mohd Adil, a law professor at the Universiti Teknologi Mara (UITM), said that the NRD recorded 750 applications between 1999 and July 2003 to change names - from Muslim to non-Muslim - in the identity cards. Of these, only 220 were granted throughout the five years. Most of the applicants were converts to Islam, said Azam. However, actual numbers of apostasy - those who file an official application to leave Islam in the courts are much lower, about 100 between 1994 and 2003 among the country's 10 mil¬lion Muslims.-Herald

In Malaysia, there are parallel systems of justice. The Islamic Sharia courts have jurisdiction over Islamic matters. The civil courts run the rest of the show.

But when you want to convert out of Islam and have the fact acknowledged by the law, the civil courts will claim no jurisdiction and throw you back to the Sharia courts when its is precisely Islam and Islamic justice that you want to renounce. What is the logic of sending someone who wants legal recognition that he or she is a non-Muslim to an Islamic court?

This is the problem faced by Lina Joy whose case has attracted international attention. [See the addendum below.]

For those of us in Malaysia of course, the small figures of those wanting to renounce Islam come as no big surprise as the law forbids missionary activity among the Malays and the government, although constituted by its founding fathers as a secular state declared itself to be an Islamic State a few years ago.

The main Malay Muslim governing party, UMNO has also adopted a more Islamist tinge to rival the Islamic party PAS that threatens its constituency.

All this happened with the UMNO General Assembly being telecast live for the first time exposing mainstream Malaysians of the extremely racist and non-Muslimophobic(hows that for a word) tone of many of the delegates and leaders of the ruling party that is supposed to be the government of all Malaysians.

With the 'Spirit' of the NEP, like some kind of sinister 'Spirit of Vatican II", being used as a front for what amounts to a little more than official state sanctioned discrimination against its diminishing non-Malay and non-Muslim population, we now also have to contend with a resurgent Islam permeating the ranks of the government and government departments and its enforcement officers.

Last month, the Islamic enforcement officers raided a condo occupied by an elderly British couple accusing them of 'khalwat' or being in close proximity. Despite the couple's protestations that they were non-Muslim(being White and speaking with a British accent should have clued the officers in), their marriage certificate was demanded from them.

How many people do you know who travel around with their marriage certificates?

And last week, a Taoist temple was demolished, despite 2 non-Muslim elected assemblymen seeing the President of the local Municipal Council to ask for a stay so that the non-Muslim Chief Minister could look into the matter.

For those in the West complaining about their ugly Churches and banal liturgies, please spare a thought for us here in Malaysia. It took 30 years, with multiple stop work orders after the foundations were poured and without compensation, relocations, redesigns so that the building looks nothing like a Church(it looks like a factory and is situated in the middle of an industrial estate and has a KFC packing plant as its neighbour) and and made lower than any nearby mosque to get a single Church built in the new administrative Capital of the state of Selangor. And this was after the Sultan himself had lamented that there were no non-Muslim places of worship in this city.

We live with overt and subtle intimidation every day.

Thank God for your freedoms.

And to people like Karen Armstrong who keep on praising Muslims and their culture, and keep dissing the Catholic Church and the Western Civilization that it built and sustained, please get on a plane fly down to Saudi Arabia and live there. You can tell them how much you love them there, face-to-niqab, if they ever allow you to speak that is.

Addendum
More on the Lina Joy case. From the Herald.

Source.

Prayer campaign for Lina Joy, will the law allow her to convert to Christianity?

Kuala Lumpur : Malaysia's Churches have committed one and all to a prayer campaign on behalf of Lina Joy, a Malay woman who converted to Christianity from Islam. After becoming Christian in 1998, Lina Joy (formerly Azlina Jailani) applied first to the National Registration Department (NRD) and then the Court of Appeal to change her identity papers to remove `Islam' as her religion. She was refused in both cases because as an ethnic Malay she was legally Muslim and "could not change religion". Religious issues involving Malays, including conversions to other reli¬gions, fall under the jurisdiction of Islamic courts and not the country's general laws. Lina Joy's problem is that if she is not recognised as Christian she can only marry a Muslim man in a Muslim ceremony and will be subject to Islamic family and inheritance laws. Her case has opened up the debate as to the extent to which religious free¬dom is guaranteed in Malaysia, a coun¬try that is also home to Chinese and Indian groups who generally belong to other religions. De facto, two legal systems coexist in the country: one based on Islam; the other, on the constitution. And the two are often in conflict. Lina Joy's case illustrates this clearly. The constitution guarantees freedom of religion; Islamic law prohibits conversion to any other religion. Given the seriousness of the situa¬tion, Msgr Paul Tan Chee Ing, Catholic bishop of Melata-Johor and chairman of the Christian Federation of Malaysia, is appealing to Christians to support Lina Joy through prayers. In a prepared prayer, the prelate asks the faithful to call on God to support Lina Joy, whatever the judges' verdict may be, and grant the judges the wis¬dom they need to pass judgement in the case and Malaysian Prime Minister Abdullah Badawi the strength to "uphold the Constitution". At presstime, we have not received the verdict of June 26 ruling whether the law recognises her conversion or not. - Herald

Look what arrived in the mail today

Was waiting for this for quite some time.
Since its still hush hush, I can't post a pic of the contents yet.

But I'm really thrilled =)

I'm really thankful to Sr. getting it done for me so soon.
It came by express mail with a Vatican postmark and Vatican stamps.

Hopefully, it will the first of many more to come. =)